Talk:Crossover voting

Politics Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Previous discussion

and it also cool. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.177.247.76 (talk) 23:49, 10 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Shouldn't this be merged with Party Raiding? "Crossover voting" is a nearly synonymous and less pejorative term.64.222.145.53 (talk) 16:24, 21 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Merger discussion for Crossover voting

An article that you have been involved in editing—Crossover voting—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Thunderstorm008 (talk) 09:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Closing, given the uncontested objection (on the other talk page) and no support. Klbrain (talk) 22:44, 8 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crossover voting. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100625234325/http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/alvar99b.pdf to http://polmeth.wustl.edu/media/Paper/alvar99b.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merger proposal

I think party raiding should be merged here. There is a bit of duplicated material, and party raiding is small enough that it would fit in a section in this article. Endwise (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support Braganza (talk) 09:09, 26 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I have performed the merge. Endwise (talk) 14:00, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]