Talk:Cross River Rail

A fact from Cross River Rail appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 20 November 2010 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Cross River Rail planned for Brisbane will be the largest transport project ever built in Queensland?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2010/November.

Wikipedia

Trains Low‑importance

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Australia: Brisbane / Queensland / Transport Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cross River Rail is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Brisbane task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Queensland (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian Transport (assessed as High-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of Queensland.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Remove

I suggest that the 2013 Bus and Train Tunnel proposal section on the alternative design be reduced to just one paragraph. Its a failed proposal separate to this one and so the level of detail should be low on this page. It is currently around one third of the whole article. - Shiftchange (talk) 23:37, 30 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think it would be good to chop it down a couple of paragraphs because you do have a point, but they're basically three different takes on the same proposal and I think it's worth having a solid section on the LNP version of it as well. The Drover's Wife (talk) 03:07, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cross River Rail. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101201050659/http://translink.com.au/about-translink/reporting-and-publications/media-releases/release/79 to http://www.translink.com.au/about-translink/reporting-and-publications/media-releases/release/79

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:09, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Corruption Allegations

Should we address the corruption allegations with the construction of the cross-river rail? More specifically the alleged purchase of properties near the site of the construction prior to the announcement of the project as they would increase in value. One notable figure would be Jackie Trad and the allegations surrounding her. They may or may not be correct, but I figured it might be worth mentioning the investigations. Joecompan (talk) 04:07, 28 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]