Talk:Cross Island, Mumbai

India: Maharashtra / Mumbai / Geography Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Maharashtra (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Mumbai (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Indian geography workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article has been marked as needing an infobox.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Contradiction

The lede says that it is "uninhabited"; later on it is said to be "sparsely inhabited". Lavateraguy (talk) 18:43, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 29 May 2019

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 01:00, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

– I see no evidence that the Indian island is the WP:Primary topic of those listed at Cross Island (disambiguation). BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 22:42, 29 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. An eleven-sentence stub delineating an uninhabited / sparsely inhabited islet has no claim to primary status. —Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 01:07, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Now only eight sentences. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:26, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
~~Oppose~~ Neutral. ~~There is no other article titled "Cross Island" so no need to disambiguate the title.~~ The dab page is ~~more than~~ sufficient. Station1 (talk) 03:29, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Update: I didn't notice Cross Island, Bermuda when I made my comment. Hardly anyone looks at it but it does exist. Station1 (talk) 14:39, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support. Station1 makes a good point, although there is Cross Island, Bermuda which isn't listed on the dab page. PC78 (talk) 07:37, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Weak support considering that there are many more and some of the partial matches get many more views [[1]]. Crouch, Swale (talk) 12:44, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. There are several other candidate topics (in Bermuda, Maine, Massachusetts, Alaska, Northern Island, etc.), and this stub is completely unsourced, with no clear claim of primary notability. —BarrelProof (talk) 21:13, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. Barca (talk) 02:44, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.