Talk:Cronut
 | This article was previously nominated for deletion. The result of the discussion was Keep. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||
Proposed deletion
[edit]This subject is manifestly notable per the huge amount of very substantial coverage its received in reliable independent sources. Feel free to take it to a deletion discussion if you so desire. Candleabracadabra (talk) 18:53, 29 June 2013 (UTC)
Isn't it the same like Cruller? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.96.172.246 (talk) 19:22, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
- Definitely some similarities.. Candleabracadabra (talk) 22:14, 19 July 2013 (UTC)
Not even close. Crullers are egg based, and have less butter. Cronuts are made with laminated dough. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 12.39.67.171 (talk) 15:28, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Advertisement
[edit]This article was chock full of marketing and advertising language, from the emphasis on the Cronut's exclusivity and connection with the bakery over the constant use of the ® symbol (against the manual of style) to the constant use of "imitation" for similar products. Frankly, embarrassing it was allowed to stand for as long as it did, even though (or maybe because) the subject matter itself isn't very important.
It's not perfect now, but better. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.137.43.175 (talk) 16:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC)
As of January 2018, it still reads as an advertisement and definitely doesn't follow neutral/objective standards (e.g., many claims are made without sources). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Webenji (talk • contribs) 20:04, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Cronut. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140213032322/http://blogs.villagevoice.com/forkintheroad/2013/12/dominique_ansel_interview.php to http://blogs.villagevoice.com/forkintheroad/2013/12/dominique_ansel_interview.php
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203071038/http://gothamist.com/2013/10/23/dozen_cronuts_sold_for_14000_to_ben.php to http://gothamist.com/2013/10/23/dozen_cronuts_sold_for_14000_to_ben.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:46, 3 November 2017 (UTC)