Talk:Crime in Paraguay

This article was nominated for deletion on 19 January 2011 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.

Paraguay Top‑importance

	Paraguay portal This article is part of WikiProject Paraguay, an attempt to expand, improve and standardise the content and structure of articles related to Paraguay. If you would like to participate, you can improve Crime in Paraguay, or sign up and contribute to a wider array of articles like those on our to do list.ParaguayWikipedia:WikiProject ParaguayTemplate:WikiProject ParaguayParaguay articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.

Crime and Criminal Biography Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

................................. The Robbery section is absolutely terrible. Some types of crime, it says, "are a problem." Other types are "prevalent." Furthermore, "[t]here have been incidents" of other types of crime. This type of "information" is practically useless. They give the reader essentially no information other than that Paraguay is not a crime-free nation, which I think is probably common knowledge. No one needs to look at wikipedia to learn such a thing. A much more useful paragraph would give you some sort of comparative information such as that the robbery rate is three times as high as that of the US, or roughly equal to that of New York City, or something of that sort. (I do not mean to suggest that those are the actual rates.) Incidentally, why would I need to cite my sources for the type of comment I have just made regarding potential improvements in the article? Do I really need to cite well-known writing handbooks or experts on how to write? Shouldn't the "cite your sources" rule be revised as a rule to cite your sources if your comment disputes the content rather than suggests ways it should be improved? As stated, the "cite your sources" rule potentially would deter people like me from making useful suggestions.Moviemn (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2020 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Moviemn (talk • contribs) 14:35, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]