Talk:Crime and Punishment/GA1
Appearance
GA Reassessment
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Starting GA re-assessment. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:26, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Quick fail criteria assessment
- The article completely lacks reliable sources – see Wikipedia:Verifiability.
- The topic is treated in an obviously non-neutral way – see Wikipedia:Neutral point of view.
- There are cleanup banners that are obviously still valid, including cleanup, wikify, NPOV, unreferenced or large numbers of fact, clarifyme, or similar tags.
- The article is or has been the subject of ongoing or recent, unresolved edit wars.
- The article specifically concerns a rapidly unfolding current event with a definite endpoint.
No problems when checking against quick fail criteria. Proceeding to substantive review. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:30, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
Checking against GA criteria
[edit]- It is reasonably well written.
- a (prose):
- The article is well written. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- b (MoS):
- It conforms with the Wikipedia MoS. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:35, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (prose):
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
- The article is well referenced. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- b (citations to reliable sources):
- Citations are to reliable sources, no dead links. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- c (OR):
- I find no evidence of OR. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:38, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (references):
- It is broad in its scope.
- a (major aspects):
- The article is broad in its scope . . .
- b (focused):
- . . . and remains focussed on the subject. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- The article folows a neutral point of view. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars etc.:
- No evidence of edit-warring. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:44, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- No edit wars etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- One image is used, correct fair use rationale. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Image is appropriately captioned. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- I have no hesitation in confirming GA status. An excellent well written, focussed article. Certainly worth consideration for featured article status. Jezhotwells (talk) 12:48, 20 June 2009 (UTC)
- Pass/Fail: