Talk:Crewkerne/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:01, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Disambiguations: none found

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:02, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   There are rather a large number of stray sentences and short paragraphs. Can these be consolidated?Y

   Several short paragraphs combined

   A company Solocrest Limited, founded in 1991, changed its name to Ariel Ltd in 2001. Rather clumsy. can this be rephrased to read better?Y

   Reworded

   I made a number of copy-edits and minor fixes.[1]

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Referencing is good, all those that I could access check out.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Good use of images (Geograph is an article illustrator's best friend!)

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, just a few points, on hold for seven days. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

   Thank you for the review (and edits). Hopefully the issues identified have been addressed?— Rod ^talk 20:44, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

   Good, excellent work. I am happy to pass this as a good article. Jezhotwells (talk) 21:05, 25 September 2010 (UTC)