Talk:Creeper (DC Comics)

	Comics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! If you would like to participate, you can help with the current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project's talk page.ComicsWikipedia:WikiProject ComicsTemplate:WikiProject ComicsComics articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by DC Comics work group.

Fictional characters

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[List of Amalgam Comics characters#DC versus Marvel/Marvel versus DC #1–4 (1996)|Nightcreeper]] The anchor (#DC versus Marvel/Marvel versus DC #1–4 (1996)) is no longer available because it was deleted by a user before.

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

New Creeper mini for August 2006(!)

I just did some mostly minor revisions to the "Brave New World" section of this article, and in the process noticed something. One early sentence reads, "It was recently announced that a new 6-issue Creeper mini-series...would begin in August 2006." This is obviously obsolete. It was added on February 24, 2006, by one DrFinger, whose most recently listed contribution is dated April 2, 2007, and whose profile and talk page links show in red, i.e. they don't exist, so asking him/her about it doesn't seem a viable option. Does anybody out there know if this mini came out, came out late, or never came out at all?

One other thing--when I deleted the grammar warning, the illio did disappear from the preview. I was quite surprised when it showed after I clicked "Save", but couldn't take my comment about it out of the edit summary then. Ted Watson 22:15, 23 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm a little slow, but it just occurred to me to check the Grand Comics Database's search engine for "Creeper," and I found that the above was released, beginning with a September 2006 cover date, so I updated the article to reflect that. No more problem here. And that cover I seemed to but actually didn't have a problem with, was from that mini's first issue! How could somebody put that up but not update the text? Oh, well, as I said, nothing to worry about here any more. Ted Watson 19:46, 9 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Eclipso6.jpg

Image:Eclipso6.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 07:43, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Creeper1.jpg

Image:Creeper1.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 20:36, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Comics B-Class Assesment required

This article needs the B-Class checklist filled in to remain a B-Class article for the Comics WikiProject. If the checklist is not filled in by 7th August this article will be re-assessed as C-Class. The checklist should be filled out referencing the guidance given at Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment/B-Class criteria. For further details please contact the Comics WikiProject. Comics-awb (talk) 16:12, 31 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

C-Class rated for Comics Project

As this B-Class article has yet to receive a review, it has been rated as C-Class. If you disagree and would like to request an assesment, please visit Wikipedia:WikiProject_Comics/Assessment#Requesting_an_assessment and list the article. Hiding T 13:51, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rebooted Origins

is this section wrong? or just really poorly written. "Ryder is caught attempting to steal Yatz's newly-discovered technology. Unable to escape, Yatz injects the last sample of nanocells, still unstable, into Ryder's body in an attempt to keep the sample safe from the villains" wouldnt he be the villan, as he is the one trying to steal the nanotech? 99.199.51.71 (talk) 06:52, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

JLA appearance

…guested in Justice League of America #70 (March 1969), where Batman asked the titular superhero to determine whether the Creeper was an outlaw. This doesn’t make any sense; there is no “titular superhero” of JLA. I edited it, but I’m not at all familiar with the story, so now it’s vague. Can someone clarify this? —Frungi (talk) 19:20, 14 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Creeper (comics). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100404082507/http://scifiblock.com/comics/the-creeper.htm to http://scifiblock.com/comics/the-creeper.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]