Jump to content

Talk:Creation science/Archives index

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Report generated based on a request from Talk:Creation science. It matches the following masks: Talk:Creation_science/Archive <#>, Talk:Scientific creationism, Talk:Creation science.
This page was last edited by Legobot (talk | contribs) 22 days ago. (Update timer)

Discussion Topic Replies (estimated) Archive Link
Disbelieve 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Disbelieve
The C.S. Lewis bit... 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#The C.S. Lewis bit...
Creation science as science section 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Creation science as science section
POV compromise 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#POV compromise
Creationism is not science 27 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Creationism is not science
Related 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Related
Creation Science as propaganda 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Creation Science as propaganda
Original research 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 1#Original research
Response to RfC 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Response to RfC
quote mine 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#quote mine
Pseudoscience 41 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Pseudoscience
let's talk about nonsense 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#let's talk about nonsense
Edit conflict? 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Edit conflict?
First sentence 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#First sentence
Quinn quote 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Quinn quote
Totally inappropriate totally disputed tag 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Totally inappropriate totally disputed tag
Poorly written 18 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Poorly written
Lack of clarity 99 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Lack of clarity
Theistic realism 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#Theistic realism
diagrams 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 2#diagrams
Fundamentalism? 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Fundamentalism?
Creation science is not natural science or social science 95 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Creation science is not natural science or social science
Numbers on the religious beliefs of scientists 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Numbers on the religious beliefs of scientists
Scientific Criticism of Creation Science 75 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Scientific Criticism of Creation Science
Request for Comment 26 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Request for Comment
Allegations of science 22 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Allegations of science
Three revert rule 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Three revert rule
Science and empiricism - Pseudoscience 27 Talk:Creation science/Archive 3#Science and empiricism - Pseudoscience
Trolling? Bias? 25 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#Trolling? Bias?
'Far Side' comic 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#'Far Side' comic
On Ec5618's edits 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#On Ec5618's edits
Fundamental meaninglessness 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#Fundamental meaninglessness
Yet another vague interpretation of NPOV? 23 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Yet another vague interpretation of NPOV?
'Evidently' - billions of years 22 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#'Evidently' - billions of years
Creation 'science' 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#Creation 'science'
This is quite ridiculous 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#This is quite ridiculous
"Creationists are lying" 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#"Creationists are lying"
Reversions again 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#Reversions again
Massive Edit 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#Massive Edit
New article proposal 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 4#New article proposal
Problems with the intro 22 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#Problems with the intro
Newest rewrite proposal 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#Newest rewrite proposal
What's the problem with calling Fundamentalist Christians Fundamentalist Christians? 18 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#What's the problem with calling Fundamentalist Christians Fundamentalist Christians?
Careful with your edit summaries 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#Careful with your edit summaries
supernatural 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#supernatural
propaganda 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#propaganda
So what's the problem of calling bugs, bugs? 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#So what's the problem of calling bugs, bugs?
Intro bias? 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#Intro bias?
Macroevolution or evolution 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Macroevolution or evolution
What other religions believe 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#What other religions believe
What is the story of creation? 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#What is the story of creation?
A special note to Ben 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 5#A special note to Ben
Scientific has a wider meaning than you think 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Scientific has a wider meaning than you think
Creation science and parsimony 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Creation science and parsimony
Ungtss contribution 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Ungtss contribution
List of CS claims 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#List of CS claims
Creation Science 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Creation Science
if the mainstream churches 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#if the mainstream churches
CS's pathetic attempts are noteworthy 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#CS's pathetic attempts are noteworthy
Creation science (or CS) is pseudoscience 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 6#Creation science (or CS) is pseudoscience
NPOV disputed 1 Talk:Scientific creationism#NPOV disputed
NPOV problem 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#NPOV problem
The article has been moved 1 Talk:Scientific creationism#The article has been moved
Creation science is pseudoscience 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Creation science is pseudoscience
Criticism of Evolution 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Criticism of Evolution
A Modest Proposal 18 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#A Modest Proposal
Harris Poll / RfC 38 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Harris Poll / RfC
"many" vs "most" 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#"many" vs "most"
Suggested Quote 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Suggested Quote
Why CS is unscientific 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Why CS is unscientific
"Pseudoscience" accusations are unencyclopedic 33 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#"Pseudoscience" accusations are unencyclopedic
Rearranged intro 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Rearranged intro
Philosophy and theology section 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Philosophy and theology section
"Mainstream science" 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#"Mainstream science"
Neutrality 20 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Neutrality
"Introduction" 43 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#"Introduction"
"Introduction" 44 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#"Introduction"
Removing the word "pseudoscience" from the introduction 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Removing the word "pseudoscience" from the introduction
Introduction 2 27 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Introduction 2
Introduction 2 39 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Introduction 2
Current intro 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 7#Current intro
Current intro 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Current intro
Request for comment Bensaccount 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Request for comment Bensaccount
FuelWagon comment 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#FuelWagon comment
Introduction again 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Introduction again
Kdbuffalo rant 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Kdbuffalo rant
Pseudoscience? 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Pseudoscience?
Jschroeder's compromise 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Jschroeder's compromise
when in doubt, quote 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#when in doubt, quote
National Academy of Science 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#National Academy of Science
Can't we all get along? 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Can't we all get along?
Back to discussion 43 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Back to discussion
fine we can argue it here instead, or better yet, not 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#fine we can argue it here instead, or better yet, not
Problems with the protected intro 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Problems with the protected intro
Latest attempt 54 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Latest attempt
RossNixon's latest change 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#RossNixon's latest change
Introduction change 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#Introduction change
NPOV flag 23 Talk:Creation science/Archive 8#NPOV flag
two flavors, two problems 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#two flavors, two problems
article RFC 25 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#article RFC
complaints of 68.44.194.112 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#complaints of 68.44.194.112
Redundant critique, religious critiques 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Redundant critique, religious critiques
Anti-freeze 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Anti-freeze
Fallacy in intro 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Fallacy in intro
Revising the premise, with reference 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Revising the premise, with reference
no criticism in intro violates NPOV 23 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#no criticism in intro violates NPOV
Two RfCs, One Set of Comments 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Two RfCs, One Set of Comments
Approve of reorg, removed unsourced POV edits 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Approve of reorg, removed unsourced POV edits
Incorrect title? 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Incorrect title?
Awwww, please 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#Awwww, please
1 topic, 2 povs 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#1 topic, 2 povs
Religion/Science 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Religion/Science
For your review 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#For your review
NPOV Policy on pseudoscience 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 9#NPOV Policy on pseudoscience
An apology 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#An apology
Eastern Orthodox 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Eastern Orthodox
(Introduction) disputes 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#(Introduction) disputes
Definitions 65 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Definitions
Going in circles 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Going in circles
Bowing out for a while 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Bowing out for a while
Bensaccount position 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Bensaccount position
Content of Ronald Numbers' The Creationists 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Content of Ronald Numbers' The Creationists
Controversy 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Controversy
Weasel word 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Weasel word
'Creation science is not science'; Fact or View 29 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#'Creation science is not science'; Fact or View
Please consider what has already been said 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Please consider what has already been said
CS assumes Creation is observable 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#CS assumes Creation is observable
Introduction 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Introduction
NPOV NOR Cite Reliable Sources 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#NPOV NOR Cite Reliable Sources
Order of Categories 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Order of Categories
facts 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#facts
reverted Ungtss 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#reverted Ungtss
Umbrella article: 'the supernatural in science' 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Umbrella article: 'the supernatural in science'
3RR 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#3RR
MONS 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#MONS
CS does not argue that Creation is observable 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#CS does not argue that Creation is observable
rename: Ontology and methodology of evolutionary alternatives 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#rename: Ontology and methodology of evolutionary alternatives
Problems with this discussion page (16/8/5) 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Problems with this discussion page (16/8/5)
Article is very biased 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Article is very biased
appeal to authority 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#appeal to authority
Creation Science advocates disagree whether CS is science 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Creation Science advocates disagree whether CS is science
Science is Broken 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Science is Broken
Dan's unexplained reversions 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Dan's unexplained reversions
observed 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#observed
Skeptic magazine 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Skeptic magazine
Bensaccount RFC 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Bensaccount RFC
uniformitarianism 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#uniformitarianism
Merging controversy with issues 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Merging controversy with issues
Nice URL 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Nice URL
Separate Page for Criticisms? 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#Separate Page for Criticisms?
SPOV and unsourced evaluation of the criteria of science 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#SPOV and unsourced evaluation of the criteria of science
"NAS' vague reassurances" in intro 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 10#"NAS' vague reassurances" in intro
Must repeat dispute of article objectivity... 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Must repeat dispute of article objectivity...
POV-check 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#POV-check
Arguement of Philosophy v. Philosophy 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Arguement of Philosophy v. Philosophy
Bensaccount 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Bensaccount
Bones of contention 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Bones of contention
(dr.) Dino 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#(dr.) Dino
Issues in creation science 41 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Issues in creation science
Quote from Dawkins 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Quote from Dawkins
Vatican says: Pay attention to Science 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Vatican says: Pay attention to Science
Reversions 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Reversions
Non-science disclaimer 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Non-science disclaimer
Naturalism 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Naturalism
Mountain heights 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Mountain heights
radiohalos. 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#radiohalos.
Article cleanup 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Article cleanup
Clarification 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Clarification
NPOV and "carefully named" 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#NPOV and "carefully named"
 ? where located in article 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11# ? where located in article
CENSORSHIP IN WIKIPEDIA 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#CENSORSHIP IN WIKIPEDIA
"Criticism of creationism" (SIC) 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#"Criticism of creationism" (SIC)
Interesting news article 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Interesting news article
The mainstream scientific community dismisses creation science as a pseudoscience 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#The mainstream scientific community dismisses creation science as a pseudoscience
Inherently Pseudoscience 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Inherently Pseudoscience
Reverting 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Reverting
GA Removal 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#GA Removal
Category Pseudoscience 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Category Pseudoscience
Silly sentences in the article 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Silly sentences in the article
"Ethnocentrism" and the doctrine of creation 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#"Ethnocentrism" and the doctrine of creation
Issues in creation science 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Issues in creation science 2
Article lacks neutral view 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Article lacks neutral view
Speed of light 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 11#Speed of light
"Except maybe the Big Bang" 19 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#"Except maybe the Big Bang"
Cut from article 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Cut from article
Cut link 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Cut link
A Scientific Support For Darwinism 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#A Scientific Support For Darwinism
"Rabbits in the Precambrian." 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#"Rabbits in the Precambrian."
Copy editing, etc 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Copy editing, etc
"Issues in creation science" / "Metaphysical assumptions" 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#"Issues in creation science" / "Metaphysical assumptions"
Units 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Units
Not a good article 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Not a good article
REMINDER 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#REMINDER
Unbalaced Arguments 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Unbalaced Arguments
Lack of science in Creation Science 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Lack of science in Creation Science
43% of scientists, polled anonymously, believe in Creation, according to ICR 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#43% of scientists, polled anonymously, believe in Creation, according to ICR
Article cannot call Creation science scientific. 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Article cannot call Creation science scientific.
Neutrality 26 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Neutrality
My view of the situation 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#My view of the situation
Oxymoron 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Oxymoron
Removal and Redirection of "Creation Science" 20 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Removal and Redirection of "Creation Science"
Third paragraph criticism 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Third paragraph criticism
Banner. 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Banner.
New opening sentence? 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#New opening sentence?
Lead Section 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Lead Section
NPOV 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#NPOV
Science or just scientific? 20 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Science or just scientific?
This article is Written from an evolutionists point of view!!! 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#This article is Written from an evolutionists point of view!!!
Swap paras 2 & 3? 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Swap paras 2 & 3?
New paragraph proposal 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#New paragraph proposal
Creationist don't do their own research? 60 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Creationist don't do their own research?
New lead version 29 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#New lead version
Type of creationist 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Type of creationist
Are there creation scientists? 31 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Are there creation scientists?
Peer reviewed creationism 85 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Peer reviewed creationism
LEAD 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#LEAD
NPOV again 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#NPOV again
Creationism In Mainstream Schools 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Creationism In Mainstream Schools
Intelligent Design is a type of Creation Science 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Intelligent Design is a type of Creation Science
Arbitrary nonsense break 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Arbitrary nonsense break
Darwinism etc new thread 28 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Darwinism etc new thread
Popper and evolution 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Popper and evolution
Karl Popper on the scientific status of Darwin's theory of evolution 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Karl Popper on the scientific status of Darwin's theory of evolution
From the horse's mouth 34 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#From the horse's mouth
Moved 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Moved
Restored 45 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Restored
Threads to Archive 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Threads to Archive
New new lead version 31 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#New new lead version
Mr. Theriault 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Mr. Theriault
Further response Mr. Theriault 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Further response Mr. Theriault
Mr. Theriault further 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Mr. Theriault further
The Failure of Naturalism’s Imposition on Science to Produce a Neutral Point of View 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#The Failure of Naturalism’s Imposition on Science to Produce a Neutral Point of View
The battle is not fought here 23 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#The battle is not fought here
A two-word tweak to the lead 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#A two-word tweak to the lead
"Hypothesis" 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#"Hypothesis"
Beliefs and activities 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 12#Beliefs and activities
Apply Common Sense 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 13#Apply Common Sense
Peer Review 26 Talk:Creation science/Archive 13#Peer Review
"Definition of a Scientist" - unsuitable material removed 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 13#"Definition of a Scientist" - unsuitable material removed
"Intro" - Non-NPOV edits by Filll, Infophile, ConfuciusOrnis 28 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#"Intro" - Non-NPOV edits by Filll, Infophile, ConfuciusOrnis
Radionuclides 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Radionuclides
Robert V Gentry/Thomas A. Baillieul 44 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Robert V Gentry/Thomas A. Baillieul
Geophysics section 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Geophysics section
Creation science isn't an attempt to find scientific evidence 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Creation science isn't an attempt to find scientific evidence
justify 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#justify
"Creation Scientists" 20 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#"Creation Scientists"
Creationism vs Creation Science 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Creationism vs Creation Science
References 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#References
Merger proposal 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Merger proposal
Darwin and natural theology 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Darwin and natural theology
Encyclopedia Britannica is less POV 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Encyclopedia Britannica is less POV
Skeptic Magazine 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 14#Skeptic Magazine
Walt Brown (creationist) 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Walt Brown (creationist)
NPOV 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#NPOV
Biology is just science 25 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Biology is just science
Scientific or no 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Scientific or no
Undermine 39 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Undermine
Opening paragraph 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Opening paragraph
Third paragraph 20 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Third paragraph
Scientific Criticism 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Scientific Criticism
Lead again 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Lead again
POV 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#POV
Beliefs and Activities 31 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Beliefs and Activities
Answers in Genesis' "peer review" process 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Answers in Genesis' "peer review" process
Change to introduction 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#Change to introduction
More thoughts 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#More thoughts
What this article needs. . . 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#What this article needs. . .
A priori/A posteriori 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 15#A priori/A posteriori
My creation theory 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#My creation theory
Scientific Community 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Scientific Community
Lacks Empirical support? 27 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Lacks Empirical support?
Section Creation science#Creation science partially renamed as intelligent design 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Section Creation science#Creation science partially renamed as intelligent design
Radiometric dating 32 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Radiometric dating
Issues 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Issues
Is Creation Science Actually Pseudoscience? 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Is Creation Science Actually Pseudoscience?
Creation Science 16 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Creation Science
Majority of Scientists 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Majority of Scientists
"The scientific community has overwhelmingly rejected ... creation science" & related issues 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#"The scientific community has overwhelmingly rejected ... creation science" & related issues
Peace. 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Peace.
Definition/tenets of Creation Science 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#Definition/tenets of Creation Science
1960s or 1970s? 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 16#1960s or 1970s?
Facts in Creation Science 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Facts in Creation Science
Cosmologies section - a couple of observations. 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Cosmologies section - a couple of observations.
Scientific evidence for Creationism 18 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Scientific evidence for Creationism
The Lead 25 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#The Lead
A New Leaf 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#A New Leaf
1st sentence 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#1st sentence
IP cleanup edit 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#IP cleanup edit
This article has a critical lack of impartiality that makes it unsuitable as an encyclopaedic article 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#This article has a critical lack of impartiality that makes it unsuitable as an encyclopaedic article
A note on endnotes 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#A note on endnotes
Too High a Standard 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Too High a Standard
The quality of this as an encyclopaedic article is minimal 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#The quality of this as an encyclopaedic article is minimal
the word "fact" in the lead 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#the word "fact" in the lead
Fact vs theory 23 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Fact vs theory
Creation Science - Planetology 24 Talk:Creation science/Archive 17#Creation Science - Planetology
IP hopper 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#IP hopper
genesisscience.org edit war starting? 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#genesisscience.org edit war starting?
Take away from this article, "CS is something scientists don't like" LOL 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Take away from this article, "CS is something scientists don't like" LOL
most of these discussions seem to be about merit as a scientific theory not the topic itself. 7 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#most of these discussions seem to be about merit as a scientific theory not the topic itself.
Cites in support of claims. 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Cites in support of claims.
Moved the article from Creation science to Creation Science 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Moved the article from Creation science to Creation Science
Scientific Creationism in the opening sentence? 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Scientific Creationism in the opening sentence?
1st sentence 11 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#1st sentence
Design and creationism 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Design and creationism
Creation Science Edit/Add Links 24 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Creation Science Edit/Add Links
Science? 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Science?
New section needed? 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#New section needed?
Denialism 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Denialism
"Many notable scientists..." in 'History and organization' section 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#"Many notable scientists..." in 'History and organization' section
MOre areas for creation science? 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#MOre areas for creation science?
Bold changes to lead. 34 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Bold changes to lead.
'History and organization' section 10 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#'History and organization' section
Rodsgarden 39 Talk:Creation science/Archive 18#Rodsgarden
Need section about use of the word science 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Need section about use of the word science
Templates 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Templates
Revision of "Facts" stated in Article 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Revision of "Facts" stated in Article
Capitals 15 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Capitals
Over-Used Terms 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Over-Used Terms
Outdated Material 17 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Outdated Material
Scientific Description 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Scientific Description
No introduction 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#No introduction
More Outdated Material 13 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#More Outdated Material
Flood hydrology: unbalanced statements? 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Flood hydrology: unbalanced statements?
Creation Science thumbnail picture 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Creation Science thumbnail picture
No evidence of planetary flood too assertive? 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#No evidence of planetary flood too assertive?
Dead Link 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Dead Link
Weasels 19 Talk:Creation science/Archive 19#Weasels
In-universe sourcing 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#In-universe sourcing
Scientific criticism 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Scientific criticism
Limits 19 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Limits
Massive Change 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Massive Change
No mention of prominent attempt 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#No mention of prominent attempt
Overwhelming 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Overwhelming
Hatnote 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Hatnote
Scientific criticism 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Scientific criticism 2
Pseudoscience category 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Pseudoscience category
Dubious 22 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Dubious
Science 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Science
Blocked sockpuppets 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Blocked sockpuppets
Requested move 9 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Requested move
Add Kitzmiller case to lead 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Add Kitzmiller case to lead
"Fundamentalist Christian" 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#"Fundamentalist Christian"
Saltation 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Saltation
Creation vs Evolution 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Creation vs Evolution
Creation Scientist v. Creationist 21 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Creation Scientist v. Creationist
Lede too long tag 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Lede too long tag
Newsweek's 1987 article quoted in a footnote 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Newsweek's 1987 article quoted in a footnote
separate Young Earth Science (YES) from Creation science 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#separate Young Earth Science (YES) from Creation science
Adding external links 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Adding external links
Attributing scientific statements 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Attributing scientific statements
Attempt to disprove scientific facts 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Attempt to disprove scientific facts
Creation science is a pseudoscientific attempt to map the Bible into scientific facts 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Creation science is a pseudoscientific attempt to map the Bible into scientific facts
and is viewed by professional biologists as a sham.[8] 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#and is viewed by professional biologists as a sham.[8]
Unbiased Content is a Must! 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Unbiased Content is a Must!
Dinosaur Extinction 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Dinosaur Extinction
Philosophy of science 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Philosophy of science
While those within the field would consider their work scientific 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#While those within the field would consider their work scientific
Creationist vs "creationary" 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Creationist vs "creationary"
External links modified 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#External links modified
Young-earth creationism and the ID split 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Young-earth creationism and the ID split
External links modified 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#External links modified 2
Edit being reinstated rather than BRD - please check thanks 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Edit being reinstated rather than BRD - please check thanks
This Didn't Have to Be Removed 8 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#This Didn't Have to Be Removed
Missing Citations 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Missing Citations
Religious basis 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Religious basis
Scientific consensus creation science is a religious view? 4 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Scientific consensus creation science is a religious view?
Attack mode of first two paragraphs 6 Talk:Creation science/Archive 20#Attack mode of first two paragraphs
Again, NPOV, factual errors, etc. 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Again, NPOV, factual errors, etc.
Talk.origins == Science? 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Talk.origins == Science?
My revert 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#My revert
Adherents claim or creation science itself claims? 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Adherents claim or creation science itself claims?
Yespov, attribution and assail 36 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Yespov, attribution and assail
Evolutionary bias 14 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Evolutionary bias
Disputed - claim these fields "described creation science as a pseudoscientific" 5 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Disputed - claim these fields "described creation science as a pseudoscientific"
Problem with verification of first sentence 12 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Problem with verification of first sentence
"Creation vs. mainstream science in cosmology" listed at Redirects for discussion 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#"Creation vs. mainstream science in cosmology" listed at Redirects for discussion
Is the Institute of Creation Research a reliable source? 3 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Is the Institute of Creation Research a reliable source?
The lead section is too long 2 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#The lead section is too long
Metaphysical Assumptions section 1 Talk:Creation science/Archive 21#Metaphysical Assumptions section
Fallacy 5 Talk:Creation science#Fallacy
Which of these six categories does creation science belong to? 2 Talk:Creation science#Which of these six categories does creation science belong to?
Changing the word "claims" in the lede to "endeavors" 8 Talk:Creation science#Changing the word "claims" in the lede to "endeavors"
Insufficient information 2 Talk:Creation science#Insufficient information
Scientific Consensus. 6 Talk:Creation science#Scientific Consensus.

Start a discussion