Talk:Creation Ministries International
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Creation Ministries International article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 90 days |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 90 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
"Fundamentalist"
[edit]The pejorative label "fundamentalist" should be removed from the infobox. According to MOS:LABEL, such a value-laden label is best avoided, unless it's "widely used by reliable sources". This does not seem to be the case. –St.nerol (talk) 10:13, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- True, lets have some sources for the lable.Slatersteven (talk) 10:24, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
- The label should be "widely used by reliable sources to describe the subject". The subject is the organisation CMI. The source added is about creationism in general, but does not relate to CMI at all. (Perhaps it can be used to support the label at Young Earth creationism. However, that page seems to take a slightly more nuanced view.) -St.nerol (talk) 14:55, 28 August 2021 (UTC)
"Most scientists"
[edit]WP:NOTFORUM |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
The percentage of scientists who reject YEC (many, most, or whatever) does not matter. 100% of all competent scientists reject it, and therefore we write that it is pseudoscience. Every scientist who does not reject it is either a very, very specialized specialist who knows nothing about the science outside his specialty, or a moron, or a liar, or an ideologically blinkered religious fundamentalist loon who lets his beliefs win over his knowledge. The opinion of none of those people matters. The wording "most scientists reject" is incompatible with Wikipedia's rules. We do not use it in articles about beliefs as crazy as this one. --Hob Gadling (talk) 19:07, 2 September 2021 (UTC)
|
Unsubstantiated claim by wiki
[edit]WP:NOTFORUM |
---|
The following discussion has been closed. Please do not modify it. |
This wiki page about this group indicates its pseudoscience without explaining how they arrive at that conclusion; on the groups website there are many credentialed scientists involved with the group; Remember evolution is a theory which can not be proven since it takes billions of years to do so. 2601:547:C97E:3E70:54FE:965:AED7:48C4 (talk) 02:19, 16 April 2023 (UTC)
We may need to read wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk) 09:33, 18 April 2023 (UTC) |
- Start-Class Christianity articles
- Low-importance Christianity articles
- WikiProject Christianity articles
- C-Class articles with conflicting quality ratings
- C-Class Creationism articles
- High-importance Creationism articles
- C-Class Young Earth creationism articles
- Top-importance Young Earth creationism articles
- Young Earth creationism articles
- WikiProject Creationism articles