Talk:Cray X2

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by Computer hardware task force.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Name

Are there any sources that confirm that the Black Widow will be officially named "X2"? Letdorf 11:26, 18 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

X2 now just a processor blade?

It appears from recent Cray publicity that they are now using the "X2" name for a vector processor blade for the XT5h system, rather than a standalone vector supercomputer system as previously expected. Also it appears that the YARC router has been dropped in favor of the XT5h's SeaStar2+, but it's difficult to find any hard confirmation of this. I think this article needs to be updated to reflect the current reality. Letdorf (talk) 16:26, 10 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

I've now updated the article to (I hope) more accurately reflect reality. Letdorf (talk) 17:10, 25 March 2008 (UTC).[reply]

You need to update the article again to properly reflect Cray's reality. According to the PDF for the X2 blade, BOTH interconnect technologies are included. X2 blades talk to *each other* via YARC, but talk to the Opteron/Linux/Lustre/login/etc nodes via SeaStar2+. The diagram shows what appears to be a bridge chip between the Yarc chip and the SeaStar2+ chip.

http://www.cray.com/downloads/CrayX2Blade.pdf

Hardwarefreak (talk) 06:33, 29 May 2008 (UTC) Stan Hoeppner, St. Louis, MO, USA[reply]

Thanks for the tip, I've revised the article to describe both interconnects now. Letdorf (talk) 09:31, 29 May 2008 (UTC).[reply]

You've almost got it right now. ;) There are 4 processors per node, and 2 nodes per blade. Thus, there are 8 processors per blade and up to 128 GB of RAM. You have stated there are only 4 processors per blade. Hardwarefreak (talk) 07:45, 4 June 2008 (UTC) Stan Hoeppner, St. Louis, MO, USA[reply]

BTW, it would be beneficial to add the X2 blade PDF to the external links section of the article. Hardwarefreak (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Whoops, didn't spot that - edited accordingly now. Letdorf (talk) 10:39, 4 June 2008 (UTC).[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Cray X2. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:56, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]