Jump to content

Talk:Cranleigh School

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

impressive alumni but a very short article. The school deserves more. An infobox? A picture? some history? Victuallers 16:37, 23 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

semi co-educational.

[edit]

What does " semi co-educational. " mean?

Johnbibby 18:31, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]


It means there are half the number of girls to boys. In each year there are around 80 boys and 40 girls which is clearly not fully co-ed. Why did you take it off?!

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cranleigh School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Semi Protect Measures

[edit]

In the last week Cranleigh School has been in the local and national media due to disciplinary matters. As a result I believe that some recent edits of this page have been sensationalised and hold inaccuracies. I believe that protecting this page from opportunists who wish to spread inaccuracies would be advisable and give time for someone to come and correct the page in due course.

Closed: I have requested protection at WP:RfPP, please make any future requests for protection there. Danski454 (talk) 20:04, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]