Talk:Craigmillar Festival Society

Scotland Low‑importance

	Scotland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Scotland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Scotland and Scotland-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScotlandWikipedia:WikiProject ScotlandTemplate:WikiProject ScotlandScotland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Edinburgh Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Edinburgh, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Edinburgh on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EdinburghWikipedia:WikiProject EdinburghTemplate:WikiProject EdinburghEdinburgh articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Community (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Community, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.CommunityWikipedia:WikiProject CommunityTemplate:WikiProject CommunityCommunity articles

Festivals Low‑importance

	Holidays portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Festivals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Festivals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FestivalsWikipedia:WikiProject FestivalsTemplate:WikiProject FestivalsFestivals articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Initial efforts

I think I've done all I want to on this article. There are just so many POV issues with the original text I'm afraid that just editing & wikifying it is not going to be enough; it looks like a major rewrite is going to required, and I'm just not finding this subject personally interesting enough to do that. -- 63.226.38.196 03:31, 12 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have changed the tag to cleanup, as the format of the article appears fine, but it appears that there are still a lot of content cleanup issues that need to be addressed, especially about POV. Thanks, -- 12.106.111.10 21:11, 17 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have tried to broaden the POV, with academic quotes and experts in this field. Andrew Crummy 2006-03-29 20:03:15 (UTC)

Quotes/Commentary

Since the Quotes section had been flagged by others, I changed it to a Commentary section with a list of references. A slight improvement, but this section still overshadows the rest of the article in terms of length. Not sure what else to do here.
Trelawnie (talk) 05:23, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]