Talk:Craig Wood (golfer)

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	Sports portal This article is supported by the sports and games work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Golf Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Golf, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Golf-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GolfWikipedia:WikiProject GolfTemplate:WikiProject GolfGolf articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was no consensus to move the page, per the discussion below. It's true that the golfer has the best article now, but a fair number of links to the disambiguation page intend another topic, particularly a certain film editor. Given that the number of links on the dab is now up to five, this move should probably be postponed until primary usage can be established more clearly. Dekimasu よ! 15:48, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Craig Wood (golfer) → Craig Wood - The Craig Wood disambiguation page is not needed. There are only two Craig Woods' on wikipedia. One is a golfer and the other is a guitarist. The guitarist page is a short stub while the golfer's page has a lot more information. Craig Wood (golfer) should be moved to Craig Wood and on the top of the golfer's page a see also tag would be added. michfan2123 14:28, 12 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Feel free to state your position on the renaming proposal by beginning a new line in this section with *'''Support''' or *'''Oppose''', then sign your comment with ~~~~. Since polling is not a substitute for discussion, please explain your reasons, taking into account Wikipedia's naming conventions.

Mild Oppose. I don't see any big need to create disambiguation page if only two people are involved, but when they exist there should be no rush to delete them. If one of them is going to be placed as the primary disambiguation, I'd like to be some pretty good evidence that there is a strong possibility that someone searching for the ambiguous article name is likely to be looking for that page. Of course, one of the disambiguation pages includes a redlink indicating a possible future article, I have no opinion on how likely that is to happen. Instead, merge and redirect Craig Wood (disambiguation) into Craig Wood. Gene Nygaard 16:04, 13 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Fair use rationale for Image:CraigWood1941masters.jpg

Image:CraigWood1941masters.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 21:51, 13 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Jersey PGA Championship

According to [1] Wood also won the New Jersey PGA in 1938, bringing the grand total to 22 wins. 188.200.235.36 (talk) 16:52, 12 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Already listed (and counted) under "Other wins". Was not a PGA Tour event that year. Tewapack (talk) 18:38, 13 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Craig Wood (golfer). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140102191540/http://www.craigwoodgolfclub.com/course/ to http://www.craigwoodgolfclub.com/course/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:59, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]