This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Jazz, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of jazz on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JazzWikipedia:WikiProject JazzTemplate:WikiProject JazzJazz articles
This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool because one or more other projects use this class. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.
This page had several paper-based references in a bulleted list which were removed for not being footnotes. References do not stop being references when they are not footnoted; Wikipedia tends to prefer footnotes, and editors are welcomed to convert them into footnotes, but removing them simply because they aren't in html tags isn't constructive. I'm particularly worried about the paper-based ones being removed, but not the AMG reference; Wikipedians seem to shun any reference they can't immediately click on, but it's still the case that not everything worth knowing is on the internet yet, even after all these years. Converting them to "proper" references would mean doing the dirty work of actually going to the library and looking them up in person.
Handy's not exactly screaming with notability, and the paper-based encyclopedia references listed in that section are important indicators that he passes WP:MUSIC. I therefore request that they not be removed again, and I see no good reason why they should be. Chubbles (talk) 17:28, 26 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I have no idea why you want to get into an argument about how references work on wikipedia. You removed a reference, then I added another reference, so the you removed 2 references, including his year of birth. You need to understand that wikipedia is propelled by inline citations, not general references. Chubbles, as I've said before, your edits always confuse me. Cosprings (talk) 15:48, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You have not added any references; you are confusing references with footnotes. You have converted references into footnotes, making them inline citations. This is usually fine, except that you are not using them to actually verify anything substantial in the article; that Handy is a saxophonist is probably the least important thing to verify, and the references already given could be used to verify other things that are much more worthy of an inline citation. You are right that my reversion was a little blunt, and removed a little other good work (the cat of birth); I will be more surgical in fixing the article in my next edit. My understanding of references I made quite clear in the above paragraph; if you wish to make the article full of inline cites, go ahead, but it's not constructive to remove notability indicators, and other reliable sources of information that may be useful to others, in the process. Chubbles (talk) 17:12, 27 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
