Talk:Craig Bellamy/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Willbb234 (talk · contribs) 19:58, 11 August 2019 (UTC)
Comment: apologies for the delay - the article is rather long. Should be done tomorrow though. Regards, Willbb234Talk (please {{ping}} me in replies) 19:23, 12 August 2019 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- A large number of suitable references. The ones I checked clearly mentioned the information written by author.
- a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- Stays focused and covers pretty much everything.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- Currently stable. Edit war on 20 June 2019 - appears to have been resolved.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Suitable used with good captions. Appropriate credit given to author. Could do with a few more images, but sufficient for criteria.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Very well written, sufficiently verified covering the player's career. Well done!
- Pass/Fail: