Talk:Cradock, South Australia

Australia: Places / South Australia Low‑importance

	Australia portal Cradock, South Australia is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject South Australia (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of South Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Churches

Was the historic former St Gabriel's Catholic Church built as a Catholic church, or was it originally Methodist?

I was seeking to find a better reference for the text "Several old sandstone buildings remain, including the stone masonry church opened in 1924 by John H.P. Moyses." The Methodist church appears to have started construction in 1924, a call for tenders in August closed in September 1924[1] and Moyses laid its foundation stone in December 1924, not opened the building.([2] linked from [3], also [4]).

Firstly, definitely not the same place: contrast this image from the mysterious church ad with this image of St Gabriel's on Flickr, which seems to date to 1883.

This page seems to provide the explanation:

"Catholic church opened 1883 – the most attractive ever erected in the district was designed by Thomas Burgoyne of Port Augusta. The Wesleyan Methodist community built a weatherboard and iron, the Wesleyan church was used from 1884 till 1925 when it was replaced by a stone church still in use in the 1980s. The Anglican Church built in 1894 of stone, served till 1958. Is now a private residence."

In that case, I think we can probably assume the church in the ad is the 1925 Methodist church, and it'd probably be good if that went into the article in some form to explain the confusion, since the Heritage Register doesn't give an exact address and the ads for the Methodist church don't give a denomination. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:52, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed.

I got side-tracked tonight - one of the references above had an article about my great-great grandmother on the same page (!), with info I didn't have anywhere yet (and some conflicting dates), so I've been feeding Ancestry.com instead of Wikipedia, and fact-checking those dates too. --Scott Davis ^Talk 12:37, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Cradock, South Australia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160215213145/http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=16353 to http://apps.planning.sa.gov.au/HeritageSearch/HeritageItem.aspx?p_heritageno=16353

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:32, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]