Talk:Crack (password software)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crack (password software) article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by an editor in the past.

Computer Security: Computing Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computer Security, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computer security on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Computer SecurityWikipedia:WikiProject Computer SecurityTemplate:WikiProject Computer SecurityComputer Security articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Computing: Software / Security / Free and open-source software Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Software.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security.

This article is supported by Free and open-source software (assessed as Low-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Scope of this article

Shouldn't Crack (software) point to a more general view of cracks in software (i.e., "cracks" to make copied software work?) - I think the common usage of "crack" when talking about software is more along these lines, rather than referring to one specific 'nix program. 71.204.49.76 18:43, 29 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I renamed the article to give it a more specific parenthetical disambiguator. – Pnm (talk) 20:43, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion

I contested the proposed deletion of this article and replaced the reference. There are three sentences in section 3 of the source.

Alec Muffett’s crack program [Muff92] gave everyone the best available tool at the time. Like many UNIX password cracking programs, Alec’s program takes encrypted passwords from a password file and tries to guess them in a systematical manner. It is amaz- ing what it found when I first ran it on our own pass- word files.

There's also a mention in the Red Hat Linux 9 bible which isn't available in Google Books but appears to be 1+ pages. I imagine there are other references in UNIX security literature, and seems likely to meet the general notability guideline. – Pnm (talk) 20:40, 24 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I'll wave my hand and note that I'm the author of Crack, but I've addressed the "notability" question by additional citing books including Cheswick & Bellovin's "Firewalls and Internet Security" which was groundbreaking in the field; I will pick up a couple of other notable references and post them to help with future concerns. Alecmuffett (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

OK I think I have citations for absolutely everything I added now; if someone think I have been unobjective please let me know, I've tried to be very restrained. Apologies for making heavier use of the save button than the preview one, this is a learning experience. Alecmuffett (talk) 09:20, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Crack (password software). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20131203145204/http://www.securitynet.org/password-cracking-quick-guide-success/ to http://www.securitynet.org/password-cracking-quick-guide-success/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:08, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]