Talk:Cowden

UK geography Low‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Kent Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Kent, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the county of Kent in South East England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.KentWikipedia:WikiProject KentTemplate:WikiProject KentKent-related articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Kent tasks:

Here are some Kent related tasks you can do:

Clean up an article: Here are automatically generated lists of articles needing cleanup sorted alphabetically and by category.
Edit the Top and High importance articles.
Refine/polish: Ashford, Royal Tunbridge Wells, Canterbury
Expand:: List of churches in Kent, Maidstone Borough Council
NPOV: K College
Citation needed: Unreferenced Kent articles
Cleanup/Copyedit: Kingdom of Kent
Expert attention: Channel Tunnel, Bromley Civic Society
Stubs: see Kent geography stubs articles

Note: These articles may overlap with those on other related lists. If you would like to make a change, either do so yourself, or make a suggestion.

pronunciation

is it really cow-DEN, with the stress on the 2nd syllable? kwami (talk) 05:34, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. I added the pronunciation to make this clear. See http://www.bbc.co.uk/kent/places/villages/audiotours.shtml.Lonegroover (talk) 21:47, 23 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, that's just something people mess up a lot. kwami (talk) 02:48, 24 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was born there, and it's definitely cow-DEN 194.247.82.75 (talk) 10:14, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tone of article

I've tagges this article as ir reads like a narrative, not an encyclopedia. Mjroots (talk) 09:16, 12 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possible WP:COPYVIO

Parts of this article read like they came from this site, though it's not clear which is the original.Autarch (talk) 12:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

There's still work to be done on dealing with the issue, but having rewritten some of the prose, there's less of it.Autarch (talk) 12:56, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Cowden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:35, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]