This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Football League, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Football LeagueWikipedia:WikiProject National Football LeagueTemplate:WikiProject National Football LeagueNational Football League articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Dallas-Fort Worth, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Dallas-Fort WorthWikipedia:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthTemplate:WikiProject Dallas-Fort WorthDallas-Fort Worth articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Minnesota, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Minnesota on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MinnesotaWikipedia:WikiProject MinnesotaTemplate:WikiProject MinnesotaMinnesota articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This isn't much of a high-profile rivalry. These two teams have had great moments during their meetings but this isn't a rivalry worthy of a Wikipedia page. There isn't enough documentation outside of the 1970s to prove the historical nature of this rivalry. This was a great 70s rivalry but it is not one of the greatest rivalries of all-time. Mr.Viking18 (talk) 13:09, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
You have clearly not read WP:RS. It doesn't matter if the numbers are accurate or not. "Reliable source", in the context of Wikipedia, is a source that has editorial oversight, uses fact-checkers, etc. mcubed.net is clearly not that. If you have a question about whether it constitutes a reliable source, ask at Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard. Meanwhile, leave the article as is until this discussion is complete. Fred Zepelin (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]
As an experienced Wikipedian, I think that source satisfies WP:RS. I'm happy to wait for you to provide another source, but for simple mathematical calculations like this, I'm not sure it's necessary. – PeeJay22:02, 17 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]