Talk:Couvade syndrome
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
[citation needed] to death
[edit]It seems someone had some issues with this article and rather than try to calmly work it out they pointedly tagged it with with "citations" tags. Is that right? 89.159.146.135 (talk) 21:04, 10 October 2008 (UTC)
- Are you suggesting that certain articles which describe your pet beliefs don't need citations? A person's motive for tagging an article is completely irrelevant if the tag is valid. This article does, in fact, need citations. You chose to whine about the tag rather than look for any. --76.202.242.140 (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Surely the use of the terms husband and wife is problematic and heteronormative. Surely unmarried couples and lesbian couple may experience the same syndrome? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.7.97.141 (talk) 20:47, 14 February 2009 (UTC)
Unmarried cohabiting couples sometimes do, but there is no mention in the literature of it occurring to lesbian couples. Not to say for sure it isn't possible, but there is simply no documentation thereof. ProGloriaDei (talk) 15:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to one external link on Couvade syndrome. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090108140059/http://pregnancytoday.com/reference/articles/malepg.htm to http://pregnancytoday.com/reference/articles/malepg.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 00:08, 13 February 2016 (UTC)