Talk:Courtroom View Network

This article was nominated for deletion on 1 June 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus.

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Media

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia articles

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Mackay Radio
Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

Conflict of Interest declaration. Because this is my company, I have a significant conflict of interest in modifying this article. Neither I nor anyone at CVN had anything to do with the original creation of the stub. I just noticed the stub and the corresponding noteworthiness debate a couple weeks ago.

Because I have been editing and creating Wikipedia articles for years, I thought I might be able to create an article about CVN that was concise, neutral, and informative. My primary purpose, of course, is to improve Wikipedia. My secondary purpose is simply to assist any further noteworthiness discussion by providing a more substantive and better referenced article to consider. Albaum (talk) 15:01, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sure. I changed the first sentence a bit to make it look less promotional. You will probably have to upload the logo here at English Wikipedia instead of Commons, and add a non-free use rationale. Check out other company logos to see how. The witness screenshot will have to go unless your company is willing to release it under a free license. --Apoc2400 (talk) 16:57, 16 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, maybe you can help me with this. When I uploaded the witness screen shot, I did in fact release it to the public domain. But it got tagged as a copyright violation. Is it assumed that I do not have the authority to release it, or what? 76.21.30.204 (talk) 05:11, 17 June 2009 (UTC)Albaum (talk) 05:12, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, they probably assumed you just grabbed it off the website without permission. You can see here how to show that you have the authority. --Apoc2400 (talk) 08:42, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Courtroom View Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090822165328/http://www.judges.org:80/news/news031609.html to http://www.judges.org/news/news031609.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 16:25, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Courtroom View Network. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]