Talk:Court McGee/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aaron north (T/C) 19:29, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After some light copyediting, this appears to satisfy all of the criteria. If the coverage seems to be light for many of his fights, it is because he was not very noteworthy until his appearance on TUF, which was covered pretty well. Aaron north (T/C) 20:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will also say that as of this review, Court McGee is a very young high-profile fighter who will very likely be involved in several important matches in the future. To pass a reassessment in the future, his biggest matches will require at least the same level of detail as his TUF appearance, and any championship matches he may fight in will probably require more detail. Aaron north (T/C) 20:10, 13 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for criteria)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
sources may appear unusual, but the "news" (non-blog) portions of these sites are probably reliable. mmajunkie is a partner of yahoo, sherdog provides content for espn.
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail: