Talk:Courbet-class battleship

Courbet-class battleship has been listed as one of the Warfare good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Courbet-class battleship is part of the Battleships of France series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 11, 2010	Good article nominee	Listed
August 25, 2020	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 30, 2009.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that in April 1919, the crew of the French Courbet-class battleship Jean Bart (pictured) mutinied while helping defend Sevastopol from the advancing Bolsheviks?

Current status: Good article

Military history: Maritime / European / French / World War I / World War II / Operation Majestic Titan

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

Associated task forces:
/
	Maritime warfare task force
	European military history task force
	French military history task force
	World War I task force
	World War II task force
	Operation Majestic Titan (Phase I)

Ships

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ships, a project to improve all Ship-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other articles, please join the project, or contribute to the project discussion. All interested editors are welcome. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.ShipsWikipedia:WikiProject ShipsTemplate:WikiProject ShipsShips articles

hexagonal geometry

to my knowledge, no french pre-dreadnought had this gun geometry, thus the statement that was abandoned seems a confusion with the german navy. pietro151.29.185.59 (talk) 18:04, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct that the French never arranged their primary guns that way, but they were very fond of four wing turrets for the secondary armament which amounted to much the same thing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 19:34, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The hexagonal mixed armament was diffuse on the pre-dreadnought: the last US ships had 4/305+8/203, the italian Pisa and San Giorgio 4/254+8/190, the russian Pavel I had 4/305+8/203 (plus other 203 in battery), the russian Rurik II 4/254+8/203, the Radetzky 4/305+8/240 ... But this geometry was never used on the french vessels: the Danton had 12/240 in SIX wing turrets and all the former vessels had more than 4 wing turrets. If you mean that the french engineers reduced the importance of the wing turrets you are perfectly correct (indeed, the reduction is even more important than starting from the hexagonal geometry), but the statement that the previous vessels has the hexagonal geometry is not correct. pietro151.29.185.59 (talk) 10:47, 27 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]