Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Is it reasonably well written?
A. Prose quality:

B. MoS compliance:
Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
A. References to sources:

B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

C. No original research:
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. Major aspects:

B. Focused:
Is it neutral?
Fair representation without bias:
Is it stable?
No edit wars, etc:
Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

Comments

Problems with the introduction. It is supposed to be a summary of the article. And the main article tag is for a summary of another article. Could you move it and other information about their careers as battlecruisers into a short first section with the main tag (this article's fine introduction could be lifted for the purpose) and redo the introduction as a summary of the article. It would be nice if it could also mention some of the "firsts" achieved by these notable ships.
- How does it work now? Anything else you think should be covered?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The second paragraph in the Conversions section is way longer than any of the other paragraphs in the article. Could it be broken up?
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
There is no ALT text on the images. (I'll pass it without them but hey)

- Thanks for correcting my American spellings; I'm pretty good at adding the extra u, but usually forget about the s/z/c thing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]