Talk:Courageous-class aircraft carrier/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:36, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Comments
- Problems with the introduction. It is supposed to be a summary of the article. And the main article tag is for a summary of another article. Could you move it and other information about their careers as battlecruisers into a short first section with the main tag (this article's fine introduction could be lifted for the purpose) and redo the introduction as a summary of the article. It would be nice if it could also mention some of the "firsts" achieved by these notable ships.
- How does it work now? Anything else you think should be covered?--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- The second paragraph in the Conversions section is way longer than any of the other paragraphs in the article. Could it be broken up?
- Done.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)
- There is no ALT text on the images. (I'll pass it without them but hey)
Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:03, 19 July 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks for correcting my American spellings; I'm pretty good at adding the extra u, but usually forget about the s/z/c thing.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 03:44, 20 July 2010 (UTC)