Talk:Courage C60

Courage C60 has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: June 8, 2015. (Reviewed version).

Sports Car Racing

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sports Car Racing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sports Car Racing on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sports Car RacingWikipedia:WikiProject Sports Car RacingTemplate:WikiProject Sports Car RacingSports Car Racing articles

Motorsport Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Motorsport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Motorsport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MotorsportWikipedia:WikiProject MotorsportTemplate:WikiProject Motorsportmotorsport articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Courage C60/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Wizardman (talk · contribs) 21:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll give this a review; it's been waiting long enough. Wizardman 21:44, 28 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Wizardman: - any progress on this? :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 13:23, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'll knock this out either tonight or Sunday. Alas been busy this week. Wizardman 22:40, 5 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Here's the issues I found:

"The Courage C60 was a Le Mans Prototype" I'd put (LMP) next to it just so that when LMP is used later on lay readers get where the abbreviation is from.
"and it was in this format that the C60 had its most success" feels worded a little oddly at the end, not sure how I'd reword it though.
"similar to that found on open-wheel racing car at the front of the car," on an open-wheel
Double check comma usage in the second half of Design particularly, but throughout the article as well; there's quite a few extra commas that aren't needed.
"Boullion partnered Rédon to fourth place, and the fastest of the non-Audi entries." rm and
" previous one; by winning the 1000 km" should be comma instead of semicolon
Overall, the article feels on the repetitive side, since the second half is essentially just noting places in races. Not really a GA issue granted, and given the subject matter I'm not sure myself how to make it flow better without losing the encyclopedic nature. I would work on that before any attempt at FAC, though.

I'll put the article on hold and will pass it when the issues are fixed. Wizardman 23:43, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

OK, Wizardman, I think I've done the things you've requested. I don't intend to take this to FAC, mainly because it's a step too far for my writing abilities. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 00:13, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Fixes look good, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 01:54, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. :) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 08:43, 8 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Courage C60. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20051016110235/http://www.imsaracing.net/archives/2001sebring.pdf to http://www.imsaracing.net/archives/2001sebring.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:12, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]