Talk:Couples Discount/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Khazar2 (talk · contribs) 00:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'll be glad to take this review. Initial comments to follow in the next 1-3 days. Thanks in advance for your work on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:22, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

This looks strong and clearly ripe for promotion. Thanks for your work on it! Two initial questions--I'll go through the checklist a bit later tonight or tomorrow:

"Andy surprises everyone by showing up" -- why are they surprised? I thought they knew he was coming back. Is it that he gets there a day early?
"and the nail salon plot" -- what is the nail salon plot? -- Khazar2 (talk) 00:50, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]
An image should be added per criterion 6, "Illustrated, if possible, by images". Images of many cast members seem readily available, but Helms might be the best choice (e.g. File:Ed_Helms_2011.jpg). -- Khazar2 (talk) 01:51, 6 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Checklist

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.	~~See a question or two above re: clarity;~~ spotchecks show no copyright issues.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.	~~N/A, see note above~~
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.	Pass