Jump to content

Talk:County Tipperary

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

What is the largest county in the Republic of Ireland?

Depends what you mean by large, area or population? Click on the links for your answer. Djegan 19:28, 28 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Clonoulty merger

[edit]

The article on Clonoulty is not substantial. I've proposed this instead of doing it myself because I don't know if it's in the town of Tipperary or just the county. Talk amongst yourselves. Howdybob 21:21, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personally I think a deletion could be more appropriate. Djegan 22:16, 5 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Agree to just merge in would not add anything really to the article, beciseds the point that town in in the county, which then would be rednudant with current txt. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 05:10, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]
I put it up for deletion. Howdybob 16:11, 6 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Clonoulty article has been expanded, so I removed the merge proposal. It could still use a bit of work though. Howdybob 17:52, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Not bad. --Boothy443 | trácht ar 21:21, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Tipperary Crest.gif

[edit]

Image:Tipperary Crest.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 19:39, 24 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Images in the article.

[edit]

Yes, County Tipperary is most beautiful but the amount of images in the article seems a bit OTT doesn't it? Especially when you compare it to the amount of info in the article. --OfTheGreen (talk) 12:28, 25 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

One or two "county towns"?

[edit]

I see this article lists both Nenagh and Clonmel as county towns, presumably on the basis that there's council offices in both, and the council meets in each, too. Can a more direct source for this be provided? The various related articles are very inconsistent on this, and none of them seem to have an up-to-date source. See also list of urban areas in the Republic of Ireland by population, county town, counties of Ireland, and doubtless many more I'm missing. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 17:47, 10 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Would you kindly stop opening multiple discussions on the same topic? You have opened similar discussions at Dungarvan, County Town, County Tipperary, County Waterford, List of urban areas in the Republic of Ireland by population ‎and WT:IE. On Wikipedia we have one place for a centralised discussion and that would be ar WT:IE. Tx, Snappy (talk) 18:10, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's hardly inappropriate to raise discussion of sourcing an article on that article's talk page. A source for the above would be independent of Waterford -- and I expressly linked to the existing discussion, so it's not as if I'm trying to keep it a big secret. The idea of a wikiproject being the only place for discussion is dubious at best, and strays into "ownership" issues at worst. 79.97.71.180 (talk) 00:20, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
It's true you should keep a discussion in one place if you can so that all trying to research can see it in one place. You could open another section if you feel you should, however, this is not a reprimand, it is just letting you know what goes more smoothly in a discussion.
Anyway, here is a good ref for Clonmel as South Tipperary and I'll come back if I get Nenagh. ~ R.T.G 01:14, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Here is a much better reference for the both. ~ R.T.G 01:17, 16 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on County Tipperary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:39, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on County Tipperary. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:26, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]