Talk:Countesthorpe Academy

Schools Low‑importance

	Schools portal This article is related to WikiProject Schools, a collaborative effort to write quality articles about schools around the world. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page.SchoolsWikipedia:WikiProject SchoolsTemplate:WikiProject Schoolsschool articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Education in the United Kingdom (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Education in the United Kingdom, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Education in the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Education in the United KingdomEducation in the United Kingdom articles

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Countesthorpe Academy be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Leicestershire may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

[Untitled]

i went to a moot, it was open to the the entire student body. i've changed it accordingly --Mongreilf (talk) 20:47, 23 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removed material

What was essentially an advert has been up long enough, with no effort made to make it encyclopedic, so I have removed the unsourced material. Please note this is an encyclopedia requiring references to independent secondary sources, not insider knowledge or personal experience.Chemical Engineer (talk) 13:02, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It was pretty much an anti-advert as the school has long been trying to shake off its progressive origins. The source required is Teaching: the Countesthorpe Experience by John Watts. The article's deleted material is pretty much lifted from there.--Mongreilf (talk) 11:31, 12 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Countesthorpe Leysland Community College. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304033210/http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/033-2012WEB_2.pdf to http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/ResearchReportsPdfs/033-2012WEB_2.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:13, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]