Talk:Counterintelligence Group

Military history: Intelligence / Asian / Southeast Asia

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Intelligence task force
	Asian military history task force
	Southeast Asian military history task force

Tambayan Philippines Low‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

A fact from Counterintelligence Group appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 12 October 2024 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the Counterintelligence Group was disbanded because the unit was deemed successful in the "neutralization and prosecution of scalawags" in the Armed Forces of the Philippines?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2024/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Counterintelligence Group.

Wikipedia

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by AirshipJungleman29 talk 18:30, 1 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the Counterintelligence Group was disbanded in 1995 because the unit was successful in the "neutralization and prosecution of scalawags" in the Armed Forces of the Philippines?

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240120132453/https://www.rappler.com/newsbreak/explainers/why-reactivate-armed-forces-counterintelligence-group/

ALT1: ... that the Counterintelligence Group was reactivated on January 18, 2024, due to coup rumors that were reported in 2023?

Source: https://web.archive.org/web/20240120162351/https://www.rappler.com/philippines/watch-afp-chief-brawner-warns-coup-plotters-do-not-recruit-active-soldiers/
https://www.philstar.com/headlines/2023/11/04/2308816/former-military-officers-behind-destab-afp-chief

Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/The Invincible Dragon
Comment: There's a blurb there where there's a mention of the CIG being reestablished in 2005. However, I can only go on to say that Gen. Brawner Jr. mentioned in public that the unit will be fully reestablished on December 21, 2023. This one's widely reported in Philippine media.

Open to alternate hooks.

Created by Ominae (talk). Number of QPQs required: 1. Nominator has 14 past nominations.

Ominae (talk) 12:54, 18 August 2024 (UTC).[reply]

Approved the first hook. Article length and age are good, copyvio and plagiarism free, source seems to be reliable. Hook is interesting, I personally find it interesting of the usage of "scalawags" in official communiques. QPQ done. I think orphan tags are allowed to exist for it to be presentable but it would be nice to get some links to the article if you have time, but it isn't an issue for the nom. Looks good to me :) PersusjCP (talk) 19:57, 24 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]