Talk:Countergradient variation

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Evolutionary biology Low‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This is looking great so far! Advevol (talk) 22:46, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hey! I corrected some minor grammar things already, but I also had a few suggestions. 1). In your example section, I think the Sceloporus example would work really well after the plant and animal examples. I do like it where it is too, so I also had wondered if maybe a more detailed hypothetical would be ok if you didn't want to change where it is at now. I just don't know much about countergradients and thought maybe a little more explanation here would be helpful. P.S. Thanks for including plants :) 2). When talking about the experiment with the egg yolk, I was wondering if maybe splitting that up into 2 sentences might help the flow a little. 3). In the last section you explain the benefits of larger body size. One sentence mentions the connection between body size and reproductive output. (if this is the case) I might rephrase that sentence to "Increased body size" at the beginning. Shelby234 (talk) 18:13, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Shelby! I made some edits already, and I will think about changing that example to be a more specific one. I like the Sceloporus example where it is, but I might use one of the other animals to give a more detailed example rather than a hypothetical one.

Nice job! I made a couple comments, but overall, very well done. b.kaidra (talk) 18:49, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Great article! I made specific comments in your article, and most of them revolved around places where I wasn't quite understanding what you were saying. You have a somewhat complicated and abstract topic, so I suggested some places where more concrete examples might help. Also, I think that there are things that are obvious to you (i.e. the expected effect that latitude has on growth rate), that are not as obvious to me, a non-ecologist, and therefore may be confusing to other Wikipedia users. In these cases I think it would be helpful if you just laid out the basic expectations. It's looking really great, and after you address some of the comments, I think you are ready to move to the Wikipedia main page! Advevol (talk) 18:57, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Response to peer review: Most of the comments I received were about clarifying information or adding specific examples to illustrate some of the more abstract points. I addressed these by laying out expectations versus what is actually seen under countergradient variation. I also added a few specific examples of developmental deformities and moved my general example to the introduction. Hedgehog1017 (talk) 23:42, 20 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]