Talk:Counterexamples in Topology

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Counterexamples in Topology article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Mathematics Low‑priority

	Mathematics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mathematics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of mathematics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MathematicsWikipedia:WikiProject MathematicsTemplate:WikiProject Mathematicsmathematics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-priority on the project's priority scale.

Published on the net

Hi!

To my surprise I actually ran into an apparantly complete version of Counterexamples in Topology published on the net. Unfortunately, I can't remember exactly how I found it, I was probably Googling something similar to "Open uncountable ordinal space".

Should this be mentioned/linked to in the article? (Not the fact that I Googled. I'm sure you understand what I mean;)

It may of course be an illegal publication, but suppose that it is not... YohanN7 (talk) 12:16, 2 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Links to pi-base

I have noticed that there are two different links to π-Base: https://topology.jdabbs.com/ and https://topology.pi-base.org/ - the latter is the one linked from the GitHub repository. But I assume that both links contain the same content. (So probably there's no need to include both of them.) --Kompik (talk) 04:08, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]