Talk:Counter-economics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	Libertarianism portal This article is supported by WikiProject Libertarianism (assessed as Mid-importance).

Economics

	Business and economics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Economics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Economics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EconomicsWikipedia:WikiProject EconomicsTemplate:WikiProject EconomicsEconomics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

2006-2007 comments

This article is fuzzy and vague and doesn't accurately reflect the ideas of the person who coined the term at all. See this. I don't think this should be deleted outright, but it should probably be merged into Agorism. Thoughts? KleenupKrew 02:44, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I think the article should simply redirect to Economic secession... Two-Bit Sprite 18:12, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It could also redirect to Underground economy, or have a small text about the etymological source, with links to Agorism, Underground economy, and economic secession. Hashuz 20:32, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with Two-Bit Sprite, a merge with Economic secession makes the most sense, as that term seems to be used very similarly. Merging into Economic secession is probably better than vice versa, as it's more descriptive of the topic.--Eloil 00:10, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Keep it separate

I'm new to these aspects of politics (though not new to libertarian ideas), but here are my thoughts. I think agorism seems to encompass more than just economics, and the specific idea, essentially, that money can be whatever the trading parties believe it is, is important. Note that stated as I did, this sounds straightforward, but as we speak, creators of different forms of money than Federal Reserve notes and US Mint coins in the United States are being persecuted because the government does not want the competition. This is only possible because the idea (that money is whatever the individuals trading think is money) has become controversial--I.E., the people of the United States largely think of money only as that which is produced in franchise with the U.S. Government. On the content of North America, before and after the creation of the United States, money had been created and used by several other parties, in the "mainstream." Today, that is no longer mainstream. It seems odd to some, but it's obviously happened. I believe Agorists want counter-economics renewed because of the empowerment that independence from the surrounding government and its supporters would bring. I think you can see how some would say that it's a separate topic from Agorism, though Agorism does seem to leverage it. I hope my contribution is seen as respectful and insightful, though I admit to being a newbie to the topic. 206.124.31.24 06:59, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Article rewrite

I've done a rewrite of the article to clarify different usages of the word.Bradspangler 12:55, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Counter-economics. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:28, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]