Talk:Council of the District of Columbia

United States: District of Columbia / State Legislatures Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Washington, D.C. portal This article is supported by WikiProject District of Columbia (assessed as High-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject U.S. State Legislatures (assessed as Top-importance).

Politics: American Low‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by American politics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

George Washington University C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is related to the George Washington University Libraries’ Special Collections Research Center. Learn more about this collaborative project here.George Washington UniversityWikipedia:GLAM/GWUTemplate:WikiProject George Washington UniversityGeorge Washington University-related articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Election mechanics

Two of the at-large members must not be of the majority party.

Can someone explain exactly how this works? I'm assuming that DC residents get to cast five votes for at-large reps. How is the party distribution broken down? --Jfruh 22:00, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

no - 2 are elected every two years and the chair is elected every 4 years. you get two votes. if, for example, two democrats got the most votes, and the republican got the 3rd most votes, then the 1st democrat and the rebuplican would get the seats. --Scarykitty 01:57, 29 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Each party selects only one at-large candidate during the primary, so there's no possibility of having two Democrats getting the most votes, because there will be only one Democrat on the ballot in the general election. KCinDC (talk) 05:54, 20 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

At-large Election Rationale?

While I understand the mechanics, is there a reasonable explanation as to how it is legal to restrict the composition of any council seats by party? If the council were elected using a proportional representation voting method, I can see how the Republican party and, perhaps, the Statehood Green Party would get a seat. But that's not how this is done. If the city vote 90%+ for Democrats, why shouldn't all at-large seats be held by Democrats?

The real reason, I suspect, is tied to Congress's continued control over the DC government. Can anybody give an alternate explanation? -- Dharris (talk) 14:26, 23 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Compensation and Privileges

Is it worthwhile and noteworthy to include the compensation, benefits, and other privileges given to councilmembers? For example, as of 2002, councilmembers have the same parking privileges as members of Congress, such as parking in bus stops, parking on restricted residential streets, and paying parking meters (Washington Times article). As a point of comparison, the article on the United States Congress includes a section listing members' compensation and privileges. - Quacks Like a Duck (talk) 14:06, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sounds reasonable to me. —KCinDC (talk) 14:40, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You gave the source, and I agree it has sufficient notability. I'd use "since 2002" rather than "as of", with the former meaning 'from then to now' and the latter suggesting 'it was the case then'. —ADavidB 23:37, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Council of the District of Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090331094658/http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/history to http://www.dccouncil.washington.dc.us/history

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:43, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Council of the District of Columbia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:03, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Members and committees

A new "Committees" section identifies the council's committees, each chaired by a member, and includes some introductory text. Rather than include another table in the article, with duplicated names, I propose that we add a "Committee" column to the table in the Composition/Members section, and migrate the associated text there as well. Comments? —ADavidB 14:10, 15 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

With no objections, I've migrated the Committees section within the Composition section. —ADavidB 17:35, 17 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Military

Hello I'm Peter willi Andrews 61 0475076136 email vice1puppet6@gmail.com I'm in Adelaide South Australia an the Iran,Palestrina,people are here they are working wiv the security SA, an the hospital's I'm a patient at flinders hospital some ov the doctors an physycyatrists are from iran ,Palestrina an India an are running the show they have weapons etc . The current Iran general comes to Adelaide hiZ name iz Ebrahim jame hagiggi I've met him they are in control ov the mental health here I believe I'm a prizoner ov the mental health I'm very sick wiv neumonia an they keep inflicting a double dose ov zooklofluepenthixol major tranquilizer injection into me every 2 weeks an it seeps into my lungs an I'm finding it hard to live they have stolen my pension shout 30 yrs ago an I'm the poorest person bcoz ov em pleaze help me to stay alive my phone no.iz 61-0475076136 an thankyu please 2001:8004:27A1:292:CA4B:A1A7:6E7C:BB10 (talk) 20:40, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]