Talk:Council for a Livable World

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Organizations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Organizations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OrganizationsWikipedia:WikiProject OrganizationsTemplate:WikiProject Organizationsorganization articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Anti-war

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anti-war, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the anti-war movement on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Anti-warWikipedia:WikiProject Anti-warTemplate:WikiProject Anti-warAnti-war articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Blatant self promotion

This article along with Center for Arms Control and Non-Proliferation have been written with a clear POV by editors with what seems to be a connection to the subject. Nearly all the edits are from usernames with something to do with "Arms control", IPs out of D.C. and "Bnolan88" a likely account for Bridget Nolan, the Outreach Coordinator for both groups. Furthermore the actual text is written like a press release or "About us" section on an organizational website. All of the pictures used in the two articles are labeled as "Council photo" and were uploaded by the same user as the copyright holder. It's clear both articles were written by either an employee or supporter. I will begin to rectify the situation in both articles and advice or insight from other established editors would be welcome. TomPointTwo (talk) 20:55, 11 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I concur! Isn't the Council for a Livable World a communist front organization? There is no mention of "The Enemies Within" to provide a full and balanced encyclopedia article. My first impression was that the article is a press release. No mention either of Senators supported by the organization, either. IMHO, the article should be replaced with a link to the Council's web site. Hpfeil (talk) 00:12, 30 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hans Bethe center.jpg Nominated for speedy Deletion

The following images, used in this article, have been nominated for deletion:

File:Hans Bethe center.jpg, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status
File:Father robert drinan.jpg has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 07:00, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

editing

format indentation wrong 174.24.36.53 (talk) 16:35, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Amazing

Absolutely love that when it's a leftist non-profit wikipedia just links directly to their website as a citation for how Principled and Wonderful they are. Primary sources rules? Oh, we don't apply those to party members. 207.32.162.180 (talk) 10:47, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]