Talk:Correspondence (theology)

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Theology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Theology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TheologyWikipedia:WikiProject TheologyTemplate:WikiProject TheologyTheology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Skepticism Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Skepticism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of science, pseudoscience, pseudohistory and skepticism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SkepticismWikipedia:WikiProject SkepticismTemplate:WikiProject SkepticismSkepticism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Recatagorize

Correspondence is not solely a Christian topic, as it is found in various works of neoPagan (Wiccan) books, as well as applies to older religions of Polytheism and Paganism. However this reader does concur it is a stub. Reference: Theological Anthropology. 2009-11-16 T23:30 Mountain Standard Time 67.176.91.13 (talk) 06:30, 17 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Light

Light corresponds to truth, not wisdom. Wisdom is the combination of love and truth. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.156.105.223 (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete!

This entire article is broadly ridiculous - I find it borderline offensive that someone considers this to be adequate information to display in public:

I can not determine what a correspondence is from the content of the article.
The examples are not clear.
The description given is tremendously vague and there is no additional information to clarify it.
The quoting/factual content is unclear - whether its quotes from Swedenborg, or intended as fact - in either case it should be marked up clearly.
Reiterating that last point really - the current wording means that the less astute reader may be mislead into believing untruth.
The tone is broadly offensive and heavily Christian
"The Golden Age" is not made clear or linked to a relevant article
I don't think there is much information to be gained here that you do not possess already by knowing what correspondence means in the usual context

How exactly do I propose removing an article and having the author's hands chopped off?

21:04, 5 June 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jheriko (talk • contribs)