Talk:Correlation correction for attenuation
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Question
[edit]is it better to use your TCG offset to compensate for material and standard compatibility or material attenuation correction to equalize the difference. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.235.75.2 (talk • contribs) 16:59, 7 February 2007 207.235.75.2
Merge discussion
[edit]The suggestion is to merge Correction for attenuation and Disattenuation as these are essentially the same topics. I envisage using Correction for attenuation for the title, but with the main version of text taken from Disattenuation. Comments? Melcombe (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
- Merger done, but still many problems. Melcombe (talk) 11:15, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
the disattenuated correlation
[edit]According to the formula in the article, it seems that the absolute value of disattenuated correlation would end up greater than 1. Am I right? 203.98.92.232 (talk) 06:57, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
This article needs attention
[edit]The first paragraph states:
- " The correlation between two sets of parameters [...]"
However, in a frequentist framework, parameters do not have a distribution (hence, they have no correlation). This occurs in other places in the article and needs some tidying up.