Jump to content

Talk:Correction fluid

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Merging The Article

[edit]

Agree: This is barely an article anyway, so lets merge. M@$+@ Ju ~ 21:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a section on Abuse

[edit]

I'm going to add a section on abuse of Correction Fluid as an inhalent, and i think i should add a few links to the various sections on the different brands of Correction Fluid. JaMiE P 04:29, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. This knowledge better be useful; i've just broken the law and have huffed an inhalent just for wikipedia.

Wikipedia is not the right place for original research. I'm afraid it's not the appropriate vehicle for your section. SaintCahier 13:23, 11 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The abuse section is potentially useful, but the killer ingredient was 1,1,1-Trichloroethane, now banned under the Montreal Protocol. Does correction fluid still get you high? TheMadBaron 07:25, 15 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Organic solvents are psychoactive when deliberately inhaled This is a ridiculous blanket statement and quite untrue. Ethanol is an organic solvent - I don't think anyone has managed to get high by sniffing vodka! Some (and a relatively small number) or organic solvents may be psychoactive; the 1,1,1-trichloroethane in correction fluid was replaced by an alternative some years ago, so the product no longer produces any effects when inhaled. I should also point out that 1,1,1-trichloroethane was banned (along with many other halogenated compounds) for environmental reasons, not because of a perceived inhalation hazard. I would also tend to avoid tabloid hysteria phrases like "killer ingredient" - 1,1,1-trichlorethane is harmful as it increases the risk of cancer. The compound which can cause death by disrupting the heart rhythm is chloroform, not 1,1,1-trichloroethane. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.75.75.166 (talk) 07:26, 19 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]


As taken from the article...:

"==Trivia== Most correction fluid was flammable until the release of the movie Gremlins 2: The New Batch wherein Gizmo makes a bow and flaming arrow out of a paperclip, rubberband, and bottle of Wite-Out."

I don't fully understand this statement, does this mean that the movie somehow made the fluid unflammable? --Smoothtofu 22:55, 1 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Done. 219.74.173.235 10:56, 26 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

What about correction fluid available in pen format?

What about Snopake? It is claimed to be the first such product. --IanBrock (talk) 16:15, 28 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Totounel

[edit]

What is this? The only references to it on-line are to this article and copies of it, which sounds very unlikely to me if it's a genuine solvent. Toluene, perhaps? Tevildo (talk) 11:50, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I note from the page history that it should be toluene. Link fixed. Tevildo (talk) 11:52, 26 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wouldn't normally edit someone's comment except to fix markup errors, but Tevildo already struck through it, and this is a page about correction fluid, so please indulge me. —80.192.180.160 (talk) 21:28, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://pib.nic.in/newsite/erelease.aspx?relid=89738. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and according to fair use may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 14:33, 13 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Manufacturing Process Section

[edit]

The section on the manufacturing process appears to be meant for kindergarteners. It contains close to no useful information on the said manufacturing process. 78.113.95.138 (talk) 00:03, 23 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lids attached to brushes?

[edit]

White-outs don't come with brushes any more Caleb KG (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]