Jump to content

Talk:Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

There exists a German version of this article which should be integrated/linked:

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Vasorum_Antiquorum

Capital letters

[edit]

Each word of "Corpus Vasorum Antiquorum begins with a capital letter. The main page should therefore be spelt "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_Vasorum_Antiquorum"; anyone entering "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corpus_vasorum_antiquorum" should be redirected to the former, not vice versa, as is the case at the moment. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.232.135.91 (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Corpus vasorum antiquorum. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mandate on the CVA

[edit]

The mandate of the CVA as described here is pretty confusing, and the confusion carries over to other articles. The term "classical" is thrown around without much consistency. We read that it includes the 7th millenium BC. Then we have a reference to the classical Greek period. Exactly what is the CVA doing, and which CVA? Where does the CVA online fit in? Definitions need some clarification, which I will try to do.Botteville (talk) 06:52, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Well I have adjusted a bit, but the CVA website is itself rather vague. Clearly the 7th millenium BC is not classical in any sense. I imagine the printed volumes, & maybe the online ones, contain some prehistoric material from the early days of wider ambitions. Johnbod (talk) 10:21, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi John, nice to hear from you. I'm finally getting around to doing something with the pottery.Botteville (talk) 14:13, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]