Jump to content

Talk:Corporate Knights

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

Is there any criticism of Corporate Knights that would be worth including as a section? 24.128.105.64 (talk) 06:13, 25 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I made some mistakes yesterday. Thanks for schooling me. I've researched this company over the last month and so I'm going to slowly modify this page, updating it to reflect what Corporate Knights is doing in 2012. Thanks and keep in touch. NatalieJRobinson (talk) 15:08, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

It's important to remember that an encyclopedia entry is not meant to be a mirror of the company's own web page. So not only mustn't the content be copied (which is a copyright issue), but the focus must be on presenting a balanced, descriptive, neutral look at the subject. Things like "upcoming speakers" are not appropriate because they gives the article a promotional flavour; not every piece of information is encyclopedic just because it relates to the company. But it's better in its current incarnation. ... discospinster talk 15:22, 12 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:45, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Corporate Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:40, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Corporate Knights. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:12, 17 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

The proper place for these external links is not as in-line links but as references. This article should be reformatted along those lines. It also lacks a sufficient number of references not directly related to the organization itself. Most of the links are self-published or from the organization's website, which is ok but not sufficient to establish reliability and notability. TheGables (talk) 14:51, 15 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Corporate_Knights&oldid=1206796613"