Jump to content

Talk:Coroners and Justice Act 2009

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Scotland

[edit]

What bearing, if any, does this law have on Scotland? Is there equivalent legislation? 81.99.1.255 (talk) 10:40, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Almost no effect on Scotland at all (only a copuple of sections apply to Scotland, which concern military law of the UK). Scotland has its own coroners system and its own criminal justice system, so the Act has no bearing on them I have no idea whether equivalent legislation exists there. Richard75 (talk) 21:20, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Section 71 - Slavery

[edit]

There is no mention of Section 71 which appears to ban slavery. From the BBC article of 26 June 2011 Last updated at 10:32
<Url>http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-13918835</url>
entitled "Three charged with slavery offences after camp raid"
[quote]

The three were charged with offences under Section 71 of the Coroners and Justice Act 2009.
It created an offence of holding someone in slavery or servitude, or requiring a person to perform forced or compulsory labour.

[/quote]

This section will probably need adding to the Wiki page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrew Swallow (talkcontribs) 12:32, 26 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added a bullet point regarding slavery and servitude.Oosoom Talk 11:40, 12 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coroners and Justice Act 2009. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:24, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]