Talk:Coronavirus breathalyzer/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Coronavirus breathalyzer. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
More projects
Third Israeli project? http://www.timesofisrael.com/israeli-startups-breathalyzer-detector-for-covid-19-begins-early-tests --Bstard12 (talk) 13:24, 5 August 2020 (UTC)
What is the most relevant information to put in the article on the Coronavirus breathalyzer?
- Which techniques are used to detect the SARS-CoV-2 virus, virus variants and any other diseases.
- When did development, testing and use (in full operation) start?
- Which authority has approved the device for putting it on the market.
- How accurate and reliable is the test.
- What is the probability of false positive and false negative test results.
- If the test result is positive, is also determined how contagious one is and at what stage of the disease one is.
- If the test result is positive, is then an additional test required (e.g. PCR test).
- Does the test indicate the high positives who qualify for source and contact research with high priority.
- Gives the test a positive test result in asymptomatic disease and in the pre-symptomatic phase
- For whom is the test not suitable
- In what situations can the test be applied /used
- How is the test taken
- What is the duration from the start of the test till the test result
- What is the capacity per device, how many tests per hour per device.
- How often should the device be calibrated.
- How is the test result made available (digitally) to the tested person.
- How are the test results made available for national survey research.
- How are the test results interfaced to national survey research, source and contact research, national vaccination program, electronic patient system
- Who will ensure that the quality of the test is and remains guaranteed.
What do you think is most relevant? --Sneuper (talk) 08:17, 24 March 2021 (UTC)
Copyright problem removed
Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://www.independent.co.uk/asia/southeast-asia/singapore-covid-breath-test-breathonix-b1852643.html https://news.nus.edu.sg/locally-developed-60-second-breath-test-receives-provisional-authorisation-from-hsa/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)
For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Sam Sailor 15:55, 30 May 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 11:07, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
Copyright cleanup notice
I'm currently in the middle of removing a noticeable amount of text from this article, due to copyright concerns. Please do not add the text back without confirming that it is clean. Most of the violating text was added in 2021. Due to the paywalled nature of some sources, I'm having trouble double-checking some suspicious content. If anybody with access to the paywalled sources (specifically https://www.volkskrant.nl/) has this page watchlisted, it would be a huge help if you confirmed whether there were any issues or not. GreenLipstickLesbian (talk) 23:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)