Talk:Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda

On 6 May 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Coronation of William I to Coronation of William the Conqueror. The result of the discussion was moved to Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda.

Requested move 6 May 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved to Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda. Favonian (talk) 13:37, 13 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Coronation of William I → Coronation of William the Conqueror – Consistency with William the Conqueror. Tim O'Doherty (talk) 12:50, 6 May 2023 (UTC) -[reply]

Support per nom. Estar8806 (talk) 13:40, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. 〜 Festucalex • talk 14:06, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support (I only thought of this after posting the bloody thing; I'd forgotten about William I, German Emperor and William I of the Netherlands). Alansplodge (talk) 14:59, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Strong Support per nom. Rushtheeditor (talk) 15:20, 6 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - Let's stick with the regnal number scheme. GoodDay (talk) 17:21, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - The article title should also include Matilda and be called "Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda". DDMS123 (talk) 21:16, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - per WP:COMMON NAME, more known by his epithet than his regnal number, also consistent with William's page title. Ollieisanerd (talk) 07:36, 8 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Since the article covers the coronations of both William as well as Matilda, should the title reflect this and include Matilda? It would be consistent with other coronation of monarch and queen consort articles such as the Coronation of Charles III and Camilla though this article differs as they were two separate events. Yeoutie (talk) 19:44, 7 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support - William the Conqueror is his common name. Re the proposed renaming to reflect Matilda's coronation, her coronation was held at a later date, so the article presumably ought to be titled "Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda. --Hazhk (talk) 16:04, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support - (sorry, changed my mind) considering the limited sources for Matilda's coronation, there's never going to be enough material for a stand-alone article, so "Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda" sounds good to me. Alansplodge (talk) 17:21, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support "Coronations of William the Conqueror and Matilda" since the article covers both individuals. And we have to go with William's common name, which is "William the Conqueror". Keivan.f^Talk 00:12, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support with the addition of Matilda and using plural form to reflect different dates. --Killuminator (talk) 21:19, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.