Talk:Coromandel International

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Coromandel International article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

India Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Reliable and unreliable sources

Currently (October 19, 2009), this article has 23 sources used as references, most of which don't pass the WP:RS policy. Here's how I see them:

sify.com - appears to pull from a database; not a published article
google.com - another database
icarda.org - press release
thehindu.com - usually a reliable source, but this appears to be a reprint of a press release
businesstoday.intoday.in - site is currently down, so I can't tell
enet.cflindia.com - subject's own web site
cii.in - marketing piece from the Confederation of Indian Industry
cii-iq.in - another marketing piece from the Confederation of Indian Industry
murugappa.com - web site of subject's corporate parent
vizagbuzz.com - this site's own about page (seen here) says they aren't reliable
thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
ias.ac.in - looks like a solid source, but it doesn't actually say much about the subject
ohio4h.org - press release
cseindia.org - promotional; doesn't actually say much about the subject
financialexpress.com - press release that isn't actually about the subject
financialexpress.com - another press release that isn't actually about the subject
thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
thehindubusinessline.com - appears to be a press release
online.wsj.com - this is an actual article, but subject isn't mentioned until five paragraphs from the end
indiaprwire.com - press release
fao.org - database lookup that says nothing about the company
fao.org - database lookup that says nothing about the company

Without solid sourcing, there isn't an article. Right now, this article has little to no sourcing. Dori ❦ (Talk ❖ Contribs ❖ Review) ❦ 01:01, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]