Talk:Corneal topography

A fact from Corneal topography appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 4 April 2006. The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that videokeratography is a non-invasive medical imaging technique for mapping the surface topology of the cornea?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2006/April.

Wikipedia

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ideal sources for Wikipedia's health content are defined in the guideline Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources (medicine) and are typically review articles. Here are links to possibly useful sources of information about Corneal topography.

PubMed provides review articles from the past five years (limit to free review articles)
The TRIP database provides clinical publications about evidence-based medicine.
Other potential sources include: Centre for Reviews and Dissemination and CDC

As a lay person with a truly spectacular optometric history, what I see missing here is "What is it useful for", a discussion of kerataconus, hard contact lenses and possibly laser surgery for myopia. Whilst I know the answers, I'm certainly not qualified to write them properly.

Graham, monocular diploplia...—Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.63.58.240 (talk • contribs)

Thanks for your comment. The article can be expected to be expanded as time goes on, including more detail on the applications of the technique. You may find details you're looking for in the following articles:

I hope this helps. --BillC 17:22, 4 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]