Talk:Cormack Foundation
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
RS?
[edit]"established for the purpose of raising funds " The source doesn't make this statement. Should it be reworded to something more neutral? Shot info 02:36, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Hello Shot Info. Added reference which says "It exists to raise funds...". Let me know if you require more references for verification, and I will add them if necessary. Cheers, --Lester2 05:25, 24 September 2007 (UTC)
- Better, but there is a little bit of OR occuring to link the two sentences together. Nevertheless, will let it stand as it is minor in the context of the overall article. Thanks. Shot info 00:21, 25 September 2007 (UTC)
Categories:
- Stub-Class company articles
- Unknown-importance company articles
- Automatically assessed Companies articles
- WikiProject Companies articles
- Stub-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- Stub-Class Australian politics articles
- Low-importance Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australian politics articles
- WikiProject Australia articles