Talk:Copypasta

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

technology section

This section was deleted and I am unsure why. The revision note links to Primary Sources, which as I understand is ok if "reputably published". I would expect the published source code of Linux to suffice as a source that is "reputably published". Maybe I'm missing something? --Doug (talk) 01:06, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Seems like original research rather than a primary source. The reference is an example of an unusual usage of the term. Unless there are better sources, I would suggest removing the section. Pakbelang (talk) 09:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

untitled

shouldn't it say "elicit" instead of "solicit"? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:BCF1:8F0:BDCD:81C5:D2AD:8169 (talk) 22:34, 11 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

or solicit reactions from others - no, solicit is right here, definition: "to persistently endeavor to obtain". Nixinova T C 20:25, 12 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]