Talk:Copenhagen Wheel
Appearance
This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Vaporwheel?
[edit]The CW has been "available for pre-order" and "almost ready to ship" since what -- 2012 now? And it's been "in the news" since at least 2009. I think that, given Superpedestrian's terrible track record of meeting targets, as clearly illustrated in every source linked to in the article, the breathless prose about it aaaaaalmost being here ought to be tempered. Any suggestions, or shall I just have a whack at it? Bricology (talk) 09:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Bricology: Mmm, I saw one on the road yesterday, so I wouldn't exactly call it vaporware. The prose that's in the article now doesn't seem all that breathless to me, but your point about balance is taken. It might make sense to add some info on the original delivery date, if you can put your hands on references for that. -- Beland (talk) 17:41, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
- I added detail about the original unveiling, at least, and competitors who are actually shipping. -- Beland (talk) 19:05, 18 August 2016 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
[edit]The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 04:22, 4 January 2023 (UTC)