Talk:Coopernook, New South Wales

Australia: Places / New South Wales Low‑importance

	Australia portal Coopernook, New South Wales is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian places (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject New South Wales (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia, or the State Library of New South Wales.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Coopernook, New South Wales be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Early telephone system

I think that descriptions on how the early telephone system worked in this town is irrelevant to the article. Cnwb 07:00, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

who cares what you think? I thought an encyclopedia was meant to capture all relevant information about a given item? You must live in the USA. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Andrewcalvin (talk • contribs)

Andrew, I live in Melborune, Australia. And regarding the fact that you don't care what I think - I should remind you that Wikipedia is a collaborative effort, and that every user's opinion counts. This, naturally, includes your opinion, and I am trying to open debate about this article, but you refuse to play along. Cnwb 23:06, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Continuing the discussion from User talk:Cnwb

Andrew, the information I removed was not done on a "random basis". I brought the issue up on the article's talk page, and invited discussion about it. Your response was simply "i think you're a knob" [1]. Now it seems you'd rather delete the whole article than allow others to edit it. I have copied this comment onto Talk:Coopernook, New South Wales, as it's more relevant to take place there. Cnwb 23:03, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Coopernook, New South Wales. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061004225443/http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/constructionmaintenance/majorconstructionprojectsregional/pacifichighwayupgrade/programdetails/coopernookbypass.html to http://www.rta.nsw.gov.au/constructionmaintenance/majorconstructionprojectsregional/pacifichighwayupgrade/programdetails/coopernookbypass.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:15, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]